I am not going to wade deeply into the newest media releases
on a Fourth Century Coptic text fragment, that may or may not be authentic, and
is reputed to state that Jesus was married.
Others have done so already, and I will not repeat their work. Hey, why reinvent the wheel on a regular
basis? If you are interested, I would
recommend this article from catholicity and covenant.
What intrigues me is the subtext of articles that assumes
Christianity is a religion rooted in history.
It is almost as if there are some waiting expectantly for the one thing
that will prove the real historical Jesus was nothing like the Jesus of the
Scriptures, and thus will pull down the edifice of Christianity as we know
it. Of course, if that happened many
would celebrate, others mourn, and yet others continue to redefine the
argument.
It is interesting that those in the camp waiting, dare I say
hoping, for the “one thing” understand that it must come out of history. They are undeniably correct. Christianity is not rooted in
philosophy. It is not a mere ethical
system. Christianity is rooted in an
historical, and historic, claim, the resurrection of Jesus. This is the central claim, Jesus is alive, and
the tomb is empty. The question that must be answered by each one of us is, “What
happened on that Sunday morning in Jerusalem?” Everything else in Christianity derives from
this central event.
Therefore, I am not that worked up, either way, by a late
text, most likely Gnostic, which states Jesus had a wife.
If you wish to read a concise study of the “Quest for the
Historical Jesus”, I recommend N.T. Wright’s, Who was Jesus?